How to reply to a job rejection email
4 min readUpdated
Most people don't reply at all. A short, un-bitter answer is the cheapest way to stay in the running for the next opening.
A rejection email is one of the few messages where not replying is the norm — which is exactly why replying works. The person who sent it has spent hours on you and expects silence back. Three sentences that aren't bitter will be remembered longer than they should be.
This is not about changing their mind. That almost never happens, and trying makes the message worse. It is about leaving the door open, because roles get re-opened, the person they hired sometimes leaves in four months, and recruiters move companies and take their shortlists with them.
What the reply has to do
- Land within a day or two, while they still remember which candidate you were.
- Be short. Anything over about six lines reads as an appeal, not a thank-you.
- Contain no argument, no re-pitch of your qualifications, and no request to reconsider.
- Say one specific thing about the conversation, so it is obviously not a template.
- Make the next contact easy — an explicit, low-pressure offer to hear about future roles.
The shape that works
Open by thanking them for telling you, not for the opportunity in general — the point is that they bothered to close the loop. Then one line that shows you were paying attention during the process. Then the door-opener. Then stop. There is no fourth paragraph.
Asking for feedback
You can ask, but keep your expectations low and your question narrow. Most companies will not give real feedback, because saying anything specific creates legal exposure. A broad "any feedback for me?" is the easiest thing in the world to ignore. A narrow one occasionally gets answered.
- Weak: "Could you share any feedback on my application?"
- Better: "If there was one thing in the system design round you'd want to see more of, I'd find that useful."
Ask for feedback in the same message as the thank-you, never in a separate follow-up. A second email raises the cost of replying to you and lowers the odds of getting anything.
What to leave out
- Any version of "I'm surprised" or "I think there may have been a misunderstanding." Even when true, it reads as a dispute.
- A restatement of your strengths. They have your CV; they decided anyway.
- Sarcasm and false cheer. Both are obvious in writing, and the second is worse.
- A request to be kept in mind that is so vague it obliges nobody. Name the kind of role.
- Anything about how long the process took, even if it was genuinely bad.
When you were rejected after a final round
This one is worth a slightly warmer message, because getting to the last stage means several people argued for you internally. Say plainly that you'd take a call if the situation changes — that sentence is the whole reason to write.
If you never want to hear from them again
Then send nothing. A cold reply is worse than no reply, and a pointed one costs you a reference you may not know you need. Silence is a complete answer and nobody will think about it twice.